General Gaming Article

General Gaming Article


Best Free Photo Editing Software

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 11:58 AM PST

Photoshop Express Editor

Free alternatives to Photoshop

It's hard to justify paying for photo-editing software (like Adobe Photoshop) if you're not a professional photographer, designer, or artist. Fortunately, there are a ton of capable, free alternatives. The list includes age-old standbys like GIMP along with relative newcomers like PicMonkey and Autodesk's Pixlr.

Keep in mind that what we look for in a photo editor might well be different from your personal requirements. A dad photographing his kids might just want basic exposure adjustment and rudimentary red-eye removal. An artist might need extensive control over individual layers of an image. Needs vary and something as basic as Paint might be all that's required for a simple project where more complicated tools would just get in the way. 

Paint

Microsoft Paint has been included in every single version of Windows and it's useful for dumping the contents of your clipboard, cropping an image, and for some people: drawing unbelievably realistic renditions of Santa Claus. But try to adjust contrast or sharpness and you'll find Paint severely lacking. There's also the noticeable absence of any sort of layer system.

Paint

Simple, clean, and easy to use. Not very useful for advanced tasks.

Despite the lackluster feature set, Paint is fast and works well for very basic tasks. The ribbon-based interface should be immediately familiar to Windows users, and the obvious tools—pencil, paint bucket, text, erase, etc.—are a cinch to manipulate.

Final Word: Paint works well for what it is. If all you need is a simple way to crop, rotate, resize, and annotate images, this should work just fine. 

GIMP

GIMP is the Audacity of photo editors. It's been around forever and it's one of the most feature-rich free photo editors available today. Unlike Paint, it's got full layer support, a packed toolbox—with staples like the Clone Tool, Healing Tool, and a magic-wand style Fuzzy Select Tool—along with a vast library of additional plugins

GIMP

GIMP looks complicated because it is.

If anything, the sheer power of GIMP is it's greatest downfall. As much as GIMP mimics the tried-and-true interface of Photoshop, it's a program with a massive barrier to entry. Photoshop veterans might feel at home, but unaware users will need to spend time exploring the program to decipher icons—i.e., an X-Acto knife for the Crop Tool—and menu options.

The sheer number of file formats supported by GIMP is a huge boon. The compatible extensions include basics like PNG files and JPEGs as well as Photoshop's own .psd extension. 

Final Word: GIMP is a definite front-runner with its incredible feature set and huge user base. If you can get past the sometimes confusing interface, GIMP is a great alternative to Photoshop.

Paint.net

Paint.net began as a student project in 2004 at Washington State University. It has since evolved into an editor that can go toe-to-toe with GIMP and quite possibly Photoshop itself. It has full layer support and offers many of the same features that both GIMP and Photoshop users consider essential—the Clone Tool, a rudimentary Magic Wand, and all of the basics. 

Paint.net

Yup, that's a history window. Paint.net has all of the features that most editors would consider essential in a clean interface.

Where it begins to set itself apart is its user interface. At first glance, it meshes well with the modern aesthetic of Windows 8. Individual toolbars and property windows are easily distinguishable and are relegated to distinct portions of the screen. Each is clearly labeled and only essential items are displayed onscreen by default. 

The application's only real shortcoming is that it's got fewer features than GIMP. Paint.net's streamlined interface comes at the cost of quite a few features that haven't yet been implemented.

Final Word: If you value ease of use and aesthetics over raw power, Paint.net is an amazing alternative to Photoshop. It may not be as expansive as GIMP, but it's a huge leap over Microsoft Paint.

Click through to the next page to see what we thought about Pixlr Editor, Picasa, Photoshop Express Editor, and PicMonkey.


 

Pixlr Editor

Autodesk's entry in the space is Pixlr. It's available for free as a web app with native apps avilable for a wide variety of platforms. We took a look at the online-only incarnation, Pixlr Editor, for this roundup since it's a bit more fully featured. 

Pixlr

It looks a bit like an older version of Linux, but it's a capable editor.

Unlike both Paint.net and GIMP, Pixlr Editor exists entirely online. We're not fans of this setup, but we were pleasantly surprised by the editor itself. The interface isn't as clean or modern as Paint.net, but it's got all of the options on display—the Navigator window is a particularly nice touch. 

Pixlr Editor has full support for layers and includes many of the options shared by GIMP, Paint.net, and Photoshop. In fact, the differences between Pixlr Editor and the rest are largely unimportant. It's mostly a question of whether you're comfortable using an online photo editor—although the lack of plugin support could be a deal breaker for some.

Final Word: Pixlr Editor is a surprise contender. It's capable, fast, free, and works without any sort of installation. 

Picasa

Picasa's not exactly a photo editor as much as it as a photo management tool with rudimentary editing capabilities. Despite its dated interface and some general chunkiness, Google's Picasa works as a stopgap tool to quickly edit photos with fun effects like film grain and filters—Lomo-ish is one of our favorites. 

Picasa

Think of Picasa as a lightweight verison of Lightroom. It's got basic photo editing with a slew of photo-management options. 

Even if it isn't a real photo editor, the photo-management aspect of the application makes it a great choice for touching up large collections of photos quickly. Adding images to a library within Picasa gives you access to quick and easy controls for photography basics like redeye removal, automatic contrast, and straightening.

Final Word: It doesn't stand up particularly well to programs like Paint.net or GIMP, but it should work just fine for people looking for a photo manager with some basic editing options built in.

Photoshop Express Editor

Here's an advance warning: Photoshop Express Editor is about as far from the real Photoshop experience as possible. Having established that, there are still good reasons that users would gravitate toward the official experience—even if it's gimped. It's clear that Adobe intends for Photoshop Express to be a gateway into purchasing the real thing because it exists entirely online—native versions are available, but they're more app than program—and can only manipulate a single image at a time.

Photoshop Express

Pixelizing an entire image isn't exactly the most useful effect, but it certainly makes for an interesting image.

The tools on offer include exposure control, a Crop & Rotate tool, some rudimentary resizing options, and a few adjustments and effects. Despite the fact that you can only have a single image open at a time, Photoshop Express does give users a chance to use some of Adobe's superior effects and adjustments—see the image above for a demonstration of the Pixelate effect.

Final Word: It's almost ridiculous to consider Photoshop Express Editor a worthy contender after considering the huge number of worthwhile alternatives. The fact that it exists as a pop-up on a page says more than we ever could—although some of the effects are genuinely entertaining. 

PicMonkey

While GIMP does its best Photoshop impression, PicMonkey is content with being a bit of a novelty. Instead of offering users granular control over their images, PicMonkey lets editors add Overlays—clip art that ranges from arrows, stars, and hearts, to party hats, and sunglasses—text, and textures to images. 

PicMonkey

Adding cowboy hats to random images is a lot more fun than you'd thinkespecially with PicMonkey's space filter laid on top.

Of course, it's also got options to adjust exposure, rotate and crop, sharpen, resize, and add effects. Any self-serious editor will balk at the gaudy effect of PicMonkey's Cross Process setting, but we loved the casual experience of editing with PicMonkey. It's designed well and caters to beginners who aren't concerned with gaussian blurs or layered effects. An otherwise sterling experience is marred by an overabundance of premium—Royale—features that require a $4.99/month subscription. 

Final Word: If all you're looking for is an easy way to spice up an otherwise boring photo, PicMonkey is probably your best bet. It has a huge catalog of fun effects and settings that puts Instagram to shame.

And the Winner is…

GIMP is our favorite free photo editor. It takes the cake over Paint.net because of the sheer number of features packed into its otherwise passable interface.  It's not as pretty as Paint.net, or as simple—or as fun—as PicMonkey, but it comes within striking distance of Photoshop at a price that's hard to beat. There are no paid upgrades, ads, or other freeware annoyances. On the flip side, you get access to a huge library of plugins that can expand GIMP to meet your potentially specialized needs.

If all you're looking to do is add a filter and change the exposure of a single image, PicMonkey is a great choice. It's simple, easy, and pretty effective for a web-only editor. It's nothing like Photoshop, but that's a point in its favor in this case.

Did we miss anything? What's your favorite free photo editor? Let us know in the comments!

Newegg Daily Deals: Asus 23.6-Inch LED Monitor, SanDisk Ultra II 240GB SSD, and More!

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 09:22 AM PST

Asus VE247H Monitornewegg logo

Top Deal:

Yikes! With all this talk of 4K, 5K, and even 8K panels, there's going to be a need for GPU makers to step up their game so that users can play triple A titles on such beasts without needing multiple graphics cards. In the meantime, if you're the market for a Full HD 1080p monitor, then check out today's top deal for an Asus VE247H 23.6-inch LED Monitor for $120 with free shipping (normally $160 - use coupon code: [EMCAKKS39; $20 mail-in-rebate). It has a 2ms response time (GTG), built-in speakers, cable management, and is backed by a 3-year warranty.

Other Deals:

SanDisk Ultra II 2.5-inch 240GB SATA Revision 3.0 (6 Gb/s) Internal Solid State Drive for $100 with free shipping

Sapphire 100361-8GVXSR Radeon R9 290X 8GB GDDR5 PCI-E Video Card for $440 with free shipping (;Additional $20 Mail-in rebate)

Corsair Carbide Series 500R Black Steel structure with molded ABS plastic accent pieces ATX Mid Tower Computer Case for $80 with free shipping (normally $110 - use coupon code: [EMCAKKS35]; Additional $20 Mail-in rebate)

Corsair Vengeance Pro 16GB (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 2400 (PC3 19200) Desktop Memory for $160 with free shipping

Google Kills Glass Explorer Program, Hints at Better Things to Come

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 09:11 AM PST

Google GlassGoogle Glass project has a new chief

There are a couple of big changes to the Google Glass project that are taking place, the first of which is that it's now being overseen Tony Fadell, a former Apple executive and founder of Nest, which Google purchased for $3.2 billion a year ago. Ivy Ross will still run the daily operations, she'll just now report to Fadell. And the second? You can kiss the Explorer program goodbye -- Google has decided to shutter its Glass Explorer program as it moves into the next phase.

"Explorers, we asked you to be pioneers, and you took what we started and went further than we ever could have dreamed: from the large hadron collider at CERN, to the hospital operating table; the grass of your backyard to the courts of Wimbledon; in fire stations, recording studios, kitchens, mountain tops and more," Google Glass stated on its Google+ page.

After a bit of reminiscing, Google got to the point.

"As we look to the road ahead, we realize that we've outgrown the lab and so we're officially 'graduating' from Google[x] to be our own team here at Google. We're thrilled to be moving even more from concept to reality," Google Glass continued. "As part of this transition, we're closing the Explorer Program so we can focus on what's coming next."

The team said that today (January 19, 2015) is the last day to get the Glass Explorer Edition, which we suppose can now be considered collector's items. As for what the future holds, Google didn't say specifically, adding that you'll see the future versions of Glass "when they're ready."

We wouldn't be surprised if Google decided to show off a new prototype at its Google I/O conference later this year, though it will be interesting to see what the new vision entails.

Follow Paul on Google+, Twitter, and Facebook

Pictures of Nvidia's GM200 GPU Leak to the Web

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 08:48 AM PST

GM200Maxwell unchained

What better way to end the work week than by spying a glimpse of the real-deal Maxwell part we've all been waiting for? Winning the lottery? Okay, you got us on that one, but this is a cool (not close) second. Assuming the pictures making the rounds in cyberspace are real, you can take a look at Nvidia's forthcoming GM200-400-A1 GPU nestled into an engineering board (180-1G600-1102-A04).

The GM200-400-A1 part is Nvidia's newest Maxwell GPU that will reportedly appear in future GeForce Series graphics cards. According to Videocardz.com, the part is expected to be used in the next line of Titan graphics cards, which the site says will debut next month.

It's a significant part because it represents the full Maxwell experience. Rumor has it the chip will sport 3,072 CUDA cores, which is 50 percent more than the GM204.

As for the mysterious reference board, it's using 24 Hynix H5GQ4H24MFR modules (12GB in all) clocked at 7GHz.. There's no DVI port visible on the card, though you can see three DisplayPort connectors and HDMI 2.0 output.

Follow Paul on Google+, Twitter, and Facebook

Intel Reports a Record Year Despite a Massive Drop in Mobile Revenue

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 08:11 AM PST

Intel SignGaining ground in every sector except mobile

Intel can pop open the bubbly and celebrate another exceptional year in the chip business, and that might even be understating things a bit. It was just exceptional, it was record breaking -- Intel this week reported full-year revenue of $55.9 billion, operating income of $15.3 billion, and net income of $11.7 billion, the latter of which is a 22 percent improvement over last year.

In addition to a record breaking year, Intel benefited from the best fourth quarter it's ever had by raking in $14.7 billion in revenue, along with operating income of $4.5 billion and net income of $3.7 billion.

"The fourth quarter was a strong finish to a record year," said Intel CEO Brian Krzanich. "We met or exceeded several important goals: reinvigorated the PC business, grew the Data Center business, established a footprint in tablets, and drove growth and innovation in new areas. There is more to do in 2015. We'll improve our profitability in mobile, and keep Intel focused on the next wave of computing."

It will be interesting to see how Krzanich and company approach its mobile strategy, the only division to post a loss, and a big one. Intel's Mobile and Communications Group tallied just $202 million in revenue, down 85 percent from 2013 en route to a $4.2 billion loss.

However, Intel's other divisions picked up the slack, including its PC Client Group, which collected $34.7 billion in revenue, up 4 percent from a year prior. Its Data Center Group added another $14.4 billion (up 18 percent), followed by its Software business at $2.2 billion (up 1 percent) and Internet of Things Group, which is already a $2.1 billion business (up 19 percent).

Image Credit: Flickr (Nicolas Vigler)

Follow Paul on Google+, Twitter, and Facebook

Google Posts Another Windows Zero-Day Security Hole

Posted: 16 Jan 2015 05:53 AM PST

GoogleGoogle and Microsoft have different opinions on public disclosure policies

For the third time in a month, Google has gone ahead and disclosed all the gory details of a zero day vulnerability affecting Windows before Microsoft could get around to releasing a patch. It affects both Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 and has to do with how applications handle memory encryption to allow for data flow back and forth between processes running in the same logon session.

"The issue is the implementation in CNG.sys doesn't check the impersonation level of the token when capturing the logon session ID (using SeQueryAuthenticationIdToken) so a normal user can impersonate at Identification level and decrypt or encrypt data for that logon session," Google's Project Zero team explains. "This might be an issue if there's a service which is vulnerable to a named pipe planting attack or is storing encrypted data in a world readable shared memory section.

"This behavior of course might be [by] design, however not having been party to the design it's hard to tell. The documentation states that the user must impersonate the client, which I read to mean it should be able to act on behalf of the client rather than identify as the client."

Microsoft had originally planned to plug the security hole in January's Patch Tuesday rollout earlier this week, though had to be postponed due to compatibility issues -- it's now scheduled to be fixed with February's Patch Tuesday rollout, PCWorld reports. In the meantime, Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 users are left vulnerable to what's now a publicly disclosed security flaw.

The issue of publicly disclosing software vulnerabilities has become a point of contention between Google and Microsoft. It's Google's policy to give vendors like Microsoft 90 days to fix any security issues its Project Zero team finds, and any that remain unpatched after that three-month window will be disclosed to the public, no exceptions.

As far as Microsoft is concerned, companies should be working together to ensure that security holes are addressed prior to being made public, or at least have some flexibility. That wasn't the case when, earlier this month, Google disclosed a Windows 8.1 vulnerability that Microsoft was scheduled to fix on Patch Tuesday, two days after its 90-day deadline. Microsoft had asked Google to refrain from publishing the vulnerability, but its request went ignored.

"Although following through keeps to Google's announced timeline for disclosure, the decision feels less like principles and more like a 'gotcha', with customers the ones who may suffer as a result. What's right for Google is not always right for customers. We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal," Microsoft stated in a blog post.

Google's stance is that 90 days is plenty of time to plug up known security holes, and with three disclosures in a month's time, it doesn't look like the search giant has any intentions of budging on its policy.

Follow Paul on Google+, Twitter, and Facebook

Total Pageviews

statcounter

View My Stats