General Gaming Article |
- Lenovo IdeaPad Y500 Review
- 10 Things You Need To Know About Intel’s New Atom
- Adobe Says Goodbye to Creative Suite, Hello to Creative Cloud
- The Sims 4 Ships to PC in 2014
- Intel Details Atom "Silvermont" Architecture
- Newegg Daily Deals
- Stinky Footboard Controller Skips Past Funding Goal
- Barnes & Noble Slashes Nook HD and HD+ Prices for Mother's Day
| Posted: 06 May 2013 02:56 PM PDT A good idea and a great valueWhat's not to like about the Lenovo IdeaPad Y500? Imagine a 2.4GHz Core i7-3630QM CPU notebook armed with two GeForce GT 650Ms, 16GB of RAM, and a 1TB hard drive with a 16GB caching SSD, all for $1,250! If the impressive specs weren't enough, the Y500 is also quite handsome with its sharp angles, rounded corners, and brushed aluminum finish. It eschews the "extreme" gaming laptop design in favor of a simple and clean aesthetic, but a flaming-red, LED-backlit keyboard adds just enough flare to keep things interesting. Its 15.2x10.2x1.4-inch chassis also makes it much smaller and more portable than our 15.6-inch MSI GT60 zero-point laptop, and the Y500 weighs in at just six pounds, 6.8 ounces. Although it may not be Ultrabook-light, it's lighter than the very-slim Razer Blade gaming laptop (reviewed Holiday 2012), but it's much heftier power brick does increase its carry weight by more than a pound.
One unique design feature is the Y500's modular ultrabay underneath the notebook, which allows you to swap in different components. Our unit came with a second 650M GPU, but you can easily unlock this and swap it out with Lenovo's expanded 750GB HDD tray ($190), a DVD burner ($70), or cooling fan ($30). The extra flexibility is appreciated, as it allows you to transform the gaming laptop into a workstation or entertainment system. You'll be able to enjoy each configuration with the Y500's excellent JBL speakers and sharp 15.6-inch display. Even though the 1920x1080-resolution screen is a TN panel, it offers very good viewing angles all around, and the audio is loud and crisp, partially thanks to Dolby's Home Theatre V4 software. While it can't quite compare to a dedicated 2.1 setup, laptop speakers don't get much better than this. We also really liked the chiclet keyboard and found the keys to be quiet and responsive. Unfortunately, the trackpad was a big letdown. It supports all of Windows 8 multitouch gestures, like swiping in the Charms bar and pinch-to-zoom, but we often found ourselves triggering these gestures on accident. Though we were able to disable these features, which largely fixed the annoyances, but there were still occasions where the trackpad proved unresponsive. In addition, because both click buttons are clunkily integrated beneath the trackpad rather than being separate buttons, we often found ourselves unintentionally sliding the cursor when clicking. Fortunately, the internal components performed quite well—beyond what we'd expect given the Y500's affordability. This is the first time we've reviewed a laptop with two 650M GPUs in SLI and we're happy to say it had no problems blowing away our zero-point's single GTX 670. In both our STALKER and 3DMark 11 graphics benchmarks, it smoked the zero-point by more than 20 percent. The only issue we experienced was that we had to enable SLI in the Nvidia control panel, as it was disabled by default. The Y500's Core i7-3630QM's100MHz advantage over the GT60's Core i7-3610QM gave the former a marginal advantage—Lenovo's biggest lead here was 2.5 percent in the multithread-hungry x264 benchmark. In our experiential gameplay tests, the Y500 handled Portal 2 like a piece of cake, as it were, and achieved average frame rates in the 130 range. On the much more graphically formidable Far Cry 3, it achieved a 40fps average at 1080p on the default medium settings, which we consider to be in the realm of playable. But the laptop does falter when it comes to battery life, as it only lasted 163 minutes in our test—24 minutes less than the GT60. While we're withholding a Kick Ass rating on account of the lackluster battery and frustrating trackpad, those issues can be mitigated if you carry a mouse and charger with you. In general, this is a handsome, portable notebook that can compete in performance with laptops that cost hundreds more. True to its name, the IdeaPad sounds like a great idea to us. $1,250, www.lenovo.com
|
| 10 Things You Need To Know About Intel’s New Atom Posted: 06 May 2013 12:57 PM PDT How Intel's new Atom CPUs may be a game changer10. It won't suck. Atom parts have long been the butt of our jokes for being the anti-performance parts that inspired the Netbook but anyone who ever tried to drive a Netbook for anything beyond browsing knows how much Atom's sucked in performance. A dual-core, Hyper-Threaded 1.6Ghz Atom N2600 gives up a Cinebench 11.5 score of 0.47. That's just barely faster than a single-core Athlon 64 3200's score of 0.42. For reference, a Core i7-2600K gives up about 8.1 and a 3.2GHz Core 2 Duo E8200 gives you about 1.91. The actual performance isn't known, but the new "Silvermont" version of Atom should offer far more performance than we've ever seen before.
Meet the new Intel Atom family 9. No more process sloppy seconds Atom has long been the bottom bin of Intel CPUs. It didn't get access to the latest process technologies and while Core 2 and Core i7 have been on a "tick tock" strategy where two new designs are produced on each process, Atom has plowed along with a one "new" design for each process. With Silvermont, the chip gets moved to the latest 22nm process 3D transistors. Even better for Atom will be the next-generation. With the introduction of the 14nm process, Intel will introduce a "tick" Airmont and then a "tock" chip that doesn't even have a codename yet. This is just another sign of just how important Intel sees Atom to its future.
Intel Atom core block diagram 8. Silvermont probably won't bring back Netbooks. The Netbook was the hottest piece of tech that was introduced at the right time. Who didn't want a $300 mini-notebook when the entire financial world was collapsing? Unfortunately most users who bought them quickly became disenfranchised with the performance of the Netbook. In fact, Netbook sales numbers look like a failed rocket launch. Netbook sales peaked in 2010 with 32 million Netbooks sold, according to IHS. This year, 3.97 million Netbooks will sell with IHS predicting just 264,000 Netbooks will sell next year before Netbooks go extinct by 2015. Many blame the death of the Netbook on the iPad and other ARM-based tablets but we like to blame Atom. If Netbooks had had decent performance from day one, they might not have cratered so badly. Even with Silvermont and say, Core i7-lite performance, will OEMs try Netbooks again or have they had enough? We think OEMs have moved beyond the Netbook which is a bit of a shame because if they had decent performance years ago, maybe they wouldn't be the Dodo bird of PCs.
Silvermont's wide range of operation 7. Think of it as Atom i7 or Atom 2 Quad Silvermont will be built around a modular design. Each module will feature two cores and Intel can stitch together up to eight cores on a die. Unlike AMD's modular design that shares chip resources, Silvermont's cores are separate cores that only share a common L2 cache. All previous Atom chips have continued to use the ancient front side bus to connect the chips but Silvermont will feature a point-to-point interface connecting to a system agent which will hook into the memory controller. Also important in Silvermont is the move from the in-order design of all previous Atoms to an out-of-order design. Out-of-order designs allow instructions to be executed out of order to greatly increase performance over in-order designs. For perspective, out-of-order CPU designs have been used by Intel since the Pentium Pro chip. Most ARM-based CPUs have also been in order up until the Cortex A9 chips. The main penalty to out-of-order designs has been an increase in power consumption and die space which is why Intel turned to an in-order design for the original Bonnell-based Atoms in 2008. Intel says with its advanced 22nm process, it can now do an out-of-order design while keeping power consumption and die space to a minimum. Intel has also completely redesign Silvermont with larger branch predictors, improved decoders, redesigned execution units, larger L2 and reduced L2 cache latency. In a nutshell, performance of Silvermont will be a factor of 3x over the current fastest Atom's with 5x lower power consumption. Oh yeah, Silvertmont also gets SSE3.1, SSE4.2, hardware AES-NI encyprtion, hardware random number generation and several other instructions from the Westmere generation of CPUs. 6. Atom now gets Turbo too. Intel's popular and effective Turbo Boost makes an appearance in Silvermont which can now "burst" different cores up depending on the load. Intel says Atom also has the ability to run cores at different speeds as well. The company has previously pooh-poohed such an approach and still says it's more efficient to run all cores at the same speed when needed, but certain server, notebook, tablet and phone makers may want to intentionally run cores at asymmetric speeds to reduce power consumption sometimes.
Intel Atom Power Sharing Click the next page to read about how it's faster and more efficient than ARM 5. Yup. From servers to phones Silvertmont will go into micro-servers and scale down to phone iterations after introduced. And no, you aren't likely to get a tablet or phone with an 8-core Silverton variant. Those are likely aimed at micro-servers which aren't as power sensitive as a phone or tablet.
Intel Atom in tablets 4. No damnit, it's not ARM Analysts and self-appointed Internet experts have long speculated that Intel needs an ARM chip to compete with ARM because x86 can't "get er done." For what it's worth, Intel had an entire ARM division when DEC sold it the StrongARM family which turned into XScale. Intel sold XScale to Marvell in 2006 and apparently still has no regrets about it. Silvermont is pure x86.
Intel Atom workflow 3. Faster and more efficient—than ARM The battle of the last three years has clearly not been Intel vs. AMD, but x86 vs ARM. ARMchair commandos have long said x86 can't compete because it's just too power hungry. But remember, ARM is no brainiac chip. Even the super weak sauce old iterations of Atom have been performance and on power parity with ARM chips (non-believers see here). Intel says Silvermont will easily stomp all ARM chips into the dirt. While, Intel didn't actually directly say the ARM word during press briefings but you don't have to be Steven Hawking to guess what CPU architecture Intel is comparing Silverton to. Even with the power consumption of ARM chips far exceeding Silvermont, those CPUs still can't match Silvermont's performance. Up against four competing ARM chips, Intel says at the same power use, Silvermont will be from 1.6 times to 2.3 times faster and consume from 3 to 5.8 times less power. 2. But the competition has eight cores. Intel's arrogance is pretty well known. But the truth is you can't be arrogant if your products suck. That gloat has been fading of late but during our media briefings with Intel engineers, we could see the spring in their PowerPoint decks. We know, the proof is in the pudding, but Intel says Silvermont's better cores out-perform competing ARM CPUs that use inefficient quad-cores. And yeah, that thing where they have eight cores? Remember four of the cores are low power cores that take over when the high performance cores aren't needed. Intel says it's long explored such little core, big core approach and it's never been optimal.
Intel Atom's cores 1. Intel's war begins with Silvermont When did the x86 vs. ARM war begin? That's hard to say. Some say 2010, others say 2011 or even 2012. We'd say that when the war began didn't really matter. What matters is how each side reacts. Intel has long been a dangerous dragon tends to slumber when not challenged. Need proof? Go and Bing Pentium 4 or Intel's lack of interest at the high-end desktop game today. So does anyone want to piss that dragon off? ARM does. Over the last few years it and a merry band of dwarves have walked into the slumbering dragon's cave, stuck a short sword in its side and threatened the dragon's hoard of gold. Silvermont—if Intel's claims are true—could very well indicate that someone's going to get roasted. |
| Adobe Says Goodbye to Creative Suite, Hello to Creative Cloud Posted: 06 May 2013 12:28 PM PDT
|
| The Sims 4 Ships to PC in 2014 Posted: 06 May 2013 11:49 AM PDT
|
| Intel Details Atom "Silvermont" Architecture Posted: 06 May 2013 11:30 AM PDT
|
| Posted: 06 May 2013 10:42 AM PDT
Top Deal: Today's top deal is the very kick-ass Borderlands 2 game. The highly-acclaimed FPS is running for $20 with free shipping (normally $40). When we reviewed the game last year we praised it for it's hilarious writing, nonstop action, and high replayability. The game also has amazing PhysX effects which will give your video card a nice workout. Other Deals: Seagate GoFlex Satellite 500GB mobile wireless storage for $100 with free shipping (normally $200 - use coupon code: EMCXRXT62) AMD FX-4100 Zambezi 3.6GHz desktop processor for $90 with free shipping (normally $100 - use coupon code: EMCXRXT43) Seagate SV35 Series 2TB 7200 RPM hard drive for $100 with free shipping (normally $160 - use coupon code: EMCXRXT27) Samsung 840 Series 120GB SATA III SSD for $99 with free shipping (normally $130 - use coupon code: EMCXRXT28) |
| Stinky Footboard Controller Skips Past Funding Goal Posted: 06 May 2013 08:47 AM PDT
|
| Barnes & Noble Slashes Nook HD and HD+ Prices for Mother's Day Posted: 06 May 2013 08:16 AM PDT
|
It's the cloud or bust for Adobe and its customers.
The next Sims title is currently in development
Silvermont is significantly different from Atom architectures that have preceded it.
It was close, but the Stinky Footboard Kickstarter campaign was ultimately successful.
Yet another reason to consider the Nook HD/HD+.| You are subscribed to email updates from Maximum PC - All Articles To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
